Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820186›Full record

ArticleDiscover mental health2025

Navigating the psychosocial landscape of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: an autobiographic case study.

Jessica D Locke, Jason T Eastman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ophthalmic Implications of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica D LockeIndependent Researcher, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA. jessylocke@outlook.com.
Jason T EastmanCoastal Carolina University, Conway, SC, USA. jeastman@coastal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living with a rare disorder, such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS), presents unique psychosocial challenges. This autobiographical case study explores the psychological, social, and professional impacts of navigating life with hypermobile EDS (hEDS), a condition marked by chronic pain, joint instability, and diagnostic uncertainty. Placing personal experiences into the context of clinical findings and research, this study highlights both the physical and emotional toll of the syndrome, including stigma, isolation, and medical gaslighting often accompanying rare conditions. The first-person case study of the first author extracted by the second author experienced in qualitative interviewing provides a first-hand account of the importance of addressing the psychosocial dimensions of rare disorders to foster understanding, empathy, and systemic improvements in patient care. In addition to calls for more encompassing medical care, this work also advocates for increased access to psychosocial support and recognition of the broader implications of living with rare, often invisible conditions.

Indexed as

Chronic painEhlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS)Psychosocial impactRare disordersStigma and isolation

Identifiers

PMID40820186
PMCPMC12358338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.