Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2025
Efficacy of alternate day versus daily oral iron therapy in children with iron deficiency anemia: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Oral Iron Therapy: Choosing the Right Product for Your Patient.Hematology reports · 2026Review
- Iron Therapy in Pediatric Iron Deficiency and Iron-Deficiency Anemia: Efficacy, Safety, and Formulation-Specific Trade-Offs-A Narrative Review.Hematology reports · 2026Review
- Thrombosis and Anemia in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pathophysiology, Clinical Impact and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the leading cause of nutritional anemia. In some cases, oral iron therapy (OIT) fails to achieve an optimal therapeutic response. Oral doses of iron acutely increase serum hepcidin, resulting in decreased iron absorption and poor response treatment.
objectiveThe primary objective was to assess the efficacy of alternate-day versus twice-daily OIT in children with IDA. The secondary objective was to study the effects of alternate versus twice-daily OIT on serum hepcidin levels and to compare gastrointestinal side effects between groups.
methodsThis was an RCT of 40 IDA patients, aged 6 months 10 years. The first group received twice-daily OIT, and the second group received alternate-day OIT. Serum hepcidin levels were measured at baseline and 48 h after starting OIT. Changes in hemoglobin level were noted after 30 days.
resultsPatients who received alternate-day OIT had increase hemoglobin (P = 0.002) and decrease serum hepcidin (P = 0.01). Four of twenty in the alternate-day group (20%) had gastrointestinal side effects (P = 0.01).
conclusionChildren who received alternate-day OIT had lower serum hepcidin levels, which resulted in better iron absorption and compliance, significant improvement in hemoglobin levels, and fewer gastrointestinal side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40820164What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.