ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
Impact of navigation on functional and radiological outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of one hundred and ninety cases.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was developed to enhance implant positioning accuracy and optimize mechanical alignment. However, its impact on clinical outcomes remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of navigation on functional and radiological outcomes, safety, and patient-reported quality of life at mid-term follow-up.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center study including 190 patients who underwent primary TKA between January 2018 and December 2021, with a mean follow-up of 4.6 years. Ninety-five patients were operated on using optical computer navigation, while 95 underwent conventional instrumentation (sequential allocation). All surgeries were performed by the same two senior surgeons using mechanical alignment in both groups. Outcomes included the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, EQ-5D, SF-12, patient satisfaction, and radiographic alignment. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using SPSS (v28.0/v29.0).
resultsPatients in the navigated group achieved significantly greater improvement in HSS knee scores (mean increase 41.9 vs. 34.9 points; p = 0.043) and a higher proportion of clinically meaningful functional improvement (> 35-point HSS increase: 63.2% vs. 40.0%; p = 0.019) compared to the conventional group. Postoperative knee flexion was also better in the navigated group (118° vs. 113°; p = 0.048). No significant differences were observed in pain improvement (VAS), EQ-5D quality-of-life gain, or complication rates between groups. Navigation significantly reduced the number of outliers in component alignment (6.3% vs. 13.7% outside ± 3° from neutral), although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.068). On multivariate analysis, use of navigation was an independent predictor of superior functional improvement (odds ratio 2.65, 95% CI 1.38-5.12; p = 0.003), whereas other factors (age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, baseline HSS) were not significant.
conclusionsComputer-assisted navigation in TKA was associated with greater mid-term functional improvement and improved prosthetic alignment, without increasing operative time or complications. Its implementation may be especially beneficial for enhancing stability and precision in mechanically aligned TKA. These findings should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective design and mid-term follow-up duration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (retrospective comparative study).
Indexed as
Identifiers
40820163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.