ArticleScientific reports2025
Apple leaf disease severity grading based on deep learning and the DRL-Watershed algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A parallel convolutional neural network with background removal and lesion segmentation for field plant disease severity classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A study on plant disease and pest detection and counting based on multi-scale enhancement and cross-scale fusion.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Apple leaf diseases significantly impair the photosynthetic efficiency and growth quality of apple trees, leading to reduced fruit yields. Existing methods for disease detection and severity classification struggle to quickly and accurately segment and quantify diseased areas on leaves, particularly in complex backgrounds. To address this issue, we propose a method for assessing the severity of apple leaf diseases based on a combination of improved HRNet and DRL-watershed algorithms. First, we selected HRNet_w32 as the backbone feature extraction network and incorporated a Normalization Attention Mechanism (NAM). Then, we combined the Dice Loss and Focal Loss functions to construct an enhanced HRNet based semantic segmentation model for pixel-level segmentation of both apple leaf and diseased regions. Furthermore, the segmented leaf and disease regions were further optimized using the DRL-watershed algorithm to distinguish overlapping leaf regions. Experimental results demonstrate that the modified HRNet model achieved a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 88.91% and a mean pixel accuracy (mPA) of 94.13%, representing improvements of 8.77 and 7.25% points, respectively, over the original HRNet. The disease severity assessment accuracy reached 97.65%. This study not only accurately segments apple leaves and diseased areas, but also effectively addresses the impact of complex backgrounds and leaf overlap on disease severity assessment, providing a solid scientific basis for disease management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.