Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820133›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2025

Effect of the combination of remifentanil and neuromuscular blockers in pediatric endotracheal intubation: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.

Lanxin Qiao, Di Zhang, Zhengzheng Gao, Tingting Zi, Jianmin Zhang, Lijing Li, Fang Wang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lanxin QiaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China.
Di ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100016, China.
Zhengzheng GaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China.
Tingting ZiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China.
Jianmin ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China.
Lijing LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China.
Fang WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China. bchresearch@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndotracheal intubation must be performed more carefully in children than in adults, as children are likely to more serious consequences due to the buck, move, and hemodynamic changes during the procedure. The aim of this study was to explore whether increasing the use of remifentanil during anesthesia induction can further improve the effectiveness and safety of tracheal intubation in children.

designThis double-blind clinical trial included patients who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia for intubation at Beijing Children's Hospital.

methodsOne hundred thirty-eight pediatric patients aged 1-12 years, classified as having American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, who received general anesthetics for elective surgery were randomly divided into a remifentanil group (group R) (n = 69) and a placebo group (group C) (n = 69). In group R, 1 µg/kg remifentanil was intravenously infused after the intravenous infusion of other induction drugs. In group C, the same volume of normal saline was injected intravenously. The primary outcome measure was successful intubation at the first attempt with no adverse events.

resultsIn total, 129 patients (64 in the group R and 65 in the group C) were enrolled. The incidence of first-attempt successful tracheal intubation with no adverse events was greater in group R (87.5%, n = 56) than in group C (60.0%, n = 39) (OR, 4.7; 95% CI = 1.9-11.4; p < 0.001).

conclusionsCompared with the use of cisatracurium alone, the combination of low-dose remifentanil with cisatracurium was associated with a higher rate of successful first-attempt intubation without adverse events.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry. Retrospectively registered. Identifier: ChiCTR2400089691. Date: 13/9/2024.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, IntravenousAtracuriumIntubation, IntratrachealNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsRemifentanilAnesthesia, GeneralChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansInfantMalePiperidinesAnesthetics, IntravenousAtracuriumNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsPiperidinesRemifentanilIntubation-related adverse eventsPediatricRemifentanil

Identifiers

PMID40820133
PMCPMC12359987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.