ArticleScientific reports2025
Male newborn as a determinant of severe preeclampsia: a case-control study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The association between newborn sex and preeclampsia has not yet been fully investigated. The current study was conducted to assess the association between newborn sex and severe preeclampsia among women in eastern Sudan. A prospective case-control study (300 cases and 600 controls) was conducted at Gadarif Maternity Hospital in eastern Sudan. The cases were women with severe preeclampsia, while the controls were healthy women. Questionnaires were used to collect sociodemographic, clinical, and obstetric data by face-to-face interview, and multivariate binary regression was performed. Parity was significantly lower, whereas the body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in the cases compared to the controls. Significantly more cases than controls gave birth to a male newborn (209 [69.7%] vs. 327 [54.5%], p ˂ 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression showed that women who gave birth to a male newborn had higher odds of developing severe preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14 - 2.39). Other factors that were associated with the development of severe preeclampsia were primiparous (AOR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.54 - 3.83), increasing BMI (AOR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07 - 1.17), lower level of education (AOR = 31.9, 95% CI = 18.50 - 55.15), and housewives (AOR = 3.82, 95% CI = 1.74 - 8.41). The study revealed that women who gave birth to a male newborn were at higher risk of having severe preeclampsia than those who gave birth to a female newborn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.