Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820119›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hygroscopic properties modeling and thermodynamic analysis of a seamless popping capsule.

Shuo Li, Hui Ge, Hongqiang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuo LiHuabao Flavors and Fragrances Co., LTD, Shanghai, 201821, China.
Hui GeHuabao Flavors and Fragrances Co., LTD, Shanghai, 201821, China.
Hongqiang WangHuabao Flavors and Fragrances Co., LTD, Shanghai, 201821, China. whq@hbflavor.com.

Funding

Huabao Flavors and Fragrances Co., LTD NO. 2023B3T02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the thermal stability of seamless "popping" capsules at different storage temperatures to address the challenges of adhesion and texture changes affecting shelf life. Storage experiments at different temperatures identified optimal conditions for maintaining product integrity. Moisture adsorption behavior was analyzed using isothermal adsorption curves at 25 °C, 32 °C, and 37 °C, along with sorption kinetics at 68% relative humidity (RH). Capsules lost commercial viability at 37 °C and higher, and the moisture sorption isotherms followed Type II patterns. The Smith model best fit data at 25 °C and 37 °C (R

Indexed as

Isothermal adsorption curveMathematical fittingMoisture adsorption kineticsSeamless capsulesShelf lifeThermal stability

Identifiers

PMID40820119
PMCPMC12358593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.