Trial reportNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
A pilot double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of MitoQ in the treatment of septic shock: evaluating its effects on clinical outcomes and oxidative stress biomarker.
Trial report in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis: nutritional strategies for restoring bioenergetic homeostasis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Mitochondrial Immunometabolism in Sepsis: From Oxidative Stress and mtDAMP Signaling to Biomarker-Guided Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The NLRP3 Inflammasome in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Molecular Mechanisms and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial dysfunction in ARDS: unraveling the regulatory networks and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Perioperative Oxidative Stress and Sepsis: Pathophysiological and Clinical Implications.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This pilot randomized clinical trial investigated mitoquinone mesylate (MitoQ), a mitochondria-targeted antioxidant, on clinical outcomes and oxidative stress biomarkers in septic shock patients. Forty-two septic shock patients were randomized to receive MitoQ (20 mg twice daily) or placebo for 5 days alongside standard care. The primary endpoint was the trajectory of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. Secondary endpoints included oxidative stress biomarkers (superoxide dismutase [SOD], catalase [CAT], glutathione peroxidase [GPx], malondialdehyde [MDA]), vasopressor use, vasoactive-inotropic scores (VIS), serum lactate, organ support needs, organ failure recovery (SOFA ≤ 2 at day 28), and 28-day mortality. MitoQ significantly improved oxidative biomarkers at day 5 versus placebo (GPx: + 0.14 U/mL, CAT: + 15.4 U/mL, SOD: + 0.82 U/mL, MDA: -0.86 µmol/L; all P < 0.05). Serum lactate and vasopressor use declined with significant Treatment × Time interactions (lactate: P = 0.023; vasopressors: P = 0.024), though these lost significance after multiple comparison correction. VIS showed significant temporal changes and a robust Treatment × Time interaction (P = 0.001), remaining significant after correction. Vasopressor duration did not reach statistical significance (66.2 vs. 91.3 h, P = 0.087). No significant differences were observed in 28-day mortality (28.6% vs. 38.1%; P = 0.513), organ recovery (33.3% vs. 23.8%; P = 0.495), or organ support. Exploratory correlations showed that increases in SOD and GPx activity were linked to lactate reduction, and increased CAT activity was associated with lower vasopressor dose. MitoQ demonstrated modulation of oxidative stress biomarkers in patients with septic shock; however, its impact on clinical outcomes remains to be established in larger, adequately powered trials.Trial registration: The trial was registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials ( https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/75681 ) (ID code: IRCT20120215009014N500) on February 29, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40820063What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.