ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2025
Development and validation of an
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectiveTo develop and validate the predictive value of MATERIALS AND
methodsAccording to the status of ALN after NAC, we divided the breast cancer patients of the three scanners into the pathological complete remission (pCR) and non-pCR groups, respectively. Totally 630 models were obtained based on various data preprocessing, feature filtering, and modeling approaches. On the one hand, different data preprocessing methods were compared to analyze the advantages of different preprocessing methods. On the other hand, the AUC of predicting ALN status was compared among all models, and the model with the best prediction was obtained. Finally, the optimal model is combined with the clinical and the corresponding Nomogram is plotted.
resultsThe comparison of the data preprocessing modalities revealed that the model prediction of tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) radiomics was better than origin radiomics (OR), and the effect of Combat and Limma was better than without batch effects. All preprocessing modalities could be used as a potential method that can further optimize the model. The optimal model had a predicted AUC of 0.798 for ALN status after NAC for breast cancer in the test set and an AUC of 0.811 when combined with clinical characteristics.
conclusionIt is necessary to pre-process the data before conducting a study on multicenter data, and the model developed in this way can effectively predict the status of ALN after NAC in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.