ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2025
Machine learning-based prediction of gastroesophageal junction cancer using electronic medical records.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Discriminating whether esophageal-related symptoms result from gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) is challenging in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop and validate a tool to predict the likelihood of GEJC in patients with esophageal-related symptoms. The electronic medical record system was accessed to identify patients diagnosed with GEJC or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) at our hospital between 2009 and 2023. Predictive variables included demographic characteristics, symptoms, and laboratory results. After propensity score matching, significant features of GEJC were screened using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), Boruta, and logistic regression analysis. Patients were randomly divided into training and test cohorts in a 2:1 ratio. Four machine learning models were trained and validated for predicting GEJC patients. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), residual analysis, calibration curve, and Brier score. Additionally, Shapley Additive exPlanations analysis was used to explain the importance of different features. After matching, 401 GEJC patients were enrolled and compared with 401 GERD controls. Using the variables identified by LASSO, Boruta, and logistic regression analysis, we constructed four machine learning models including random forest, generalized linear model, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and support vector machine. XGBoost exhibited better predictive performance with an AUC of 0.907 in the test cohort. The calibration curve of the XGBoost model also demonstrated strong consistency with a Brier score of 0.088. Body mass index, hemoglobin, age, reflux, and dysphagia were found to be significant influences on the model output. We developed a well-performing model for predicting GEJC using electronic medical records. Implementing this prediction tool in clinical practice may guide diagnostic strategies and provide appropriate interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.