ArticleScientific reports2025
A study of the radon seasonality with temporal dummy variables.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radon, a naturally occurring radioactive gas, has garnered significant attention due to its health risks and its potential role as a seismic indicator. Variations in radon levels have been observed in correlation with seismic activity, suggesting that radon could serve as an early warning signal for earthquakes. However, accurately forecasting radon concentrations remains challenging due to the influence of various factors, including meteorological conditions and seasonal fluctuations. Considerable effort has been dedicated to investigating the use of regression models to predict radon levels by incorporating meteorological parameters such as temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressure. The aim of this study is to improve the modeling of baseline radon concentrations by removing periodic sources of variability (primarily environmental and seasonal effects), rather than directly focusing on radon anomaly detection. Accurate background modeling is a prerequisite for reliable anomaly detection, as it enables a clearer distinction between normal fluctuations and potential anomalies arising from endogenous factors, including seismic or structural phenomena. In particular, we show that the impact of meteorological parameters on radon prediction can be effectively replaced by a seasonal regression model based on temporal dummy variables, without significant loss in predictive accuracy. This method offers a promising alternative for radon modeling, enabling early estimation of average radon levels and facilitating the timely identification of anomalous behavior. Our findings suggest that seasonal regression models based on dummy variables provide a robust and accurate framework for forecasting radon, with potential implications for improved seismic monitoring. Importantly, any future application to anomaly detection must also account for structural changes at the measurement site, which may independently affect radon emissions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.