Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40820025›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Scientific rationale and guidelines to use cane sugar as a performance enhancer in lime mortars.

V S Athira, A G Sharanya, Swathy Manohar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

V S AthiraIndian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India.
A G SharanyaIndian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India.
Swathy ManoharIndian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India. swathym@iitb.ac.in.

Funding

Ansys Ltd. DO/2018-ANSY
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of guidelines and scientific knowledge on heritage materials has often led to aggravating damage in heritage structures. Developing a compatible repair binder for heritage preservation requires addressing several factors. Cane sugar is a widely used performance enhancer in lime mortars; however, there are no guidelines or data available on the dosage, form and application of the material. The work is an effort to engineer and document the techniques of adding cane sugar in appropriate quantities while monitoring its influence on further carbonation. The science governing the action of cane sugar in fermented and non-fermented form is elucidated in the current study. The addition of 1% non-fermented cane sugar led to a retention time greater than 6 h, while with fermented dosage, the retention time is reduced to 3 h. Fermented cane sugar addition supported early age compressive strength, while the non-fermented form supported slow carbonation with enhanced later age strength. However, the rate of carbonation/strength gain is higher in non-fermented cane sugar added mortars. The study classifies cane sugar as an effective water reducer, retainer, plasticiser and a reaction regulator; and proposes its application methods and influence in lime binders, which will enable attaining control and precision on formulating lime binders.

Indexed as

Air limeCane sugarFermentationHeritage preservationZeta potential

Identifiers

PMID40820025
PMCPMC12358620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.