ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting onset of myopic refractive error in children using machine learning on routine pediatric eye examinations only.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric myopia - a narrative review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Myo-ODE: continuous-time trajectory reconstruction and risk prediction of high myopia via neural ordinary differential equations.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myopia is increasingly prevalent among children, making routine eye exams crucial. This study develops machine learning (ML) models to predict future myopia development. These models utilize easily accessible, non-invasive data gathered during standard eye clinic visits, deliberately excluding more complex measurements such as axial length or corneal curvature. We used patient records from our pediatric ophthalmology clinic (2010-2022), including only those with at least two visits and no initial myopia. We created three prediction models: whether a patient will develop myopia at some point based on their first visit, be diagnosed in the subsequent visit, or be diagnosed with myopia within a year. We employed Random Forest and Gradient Boosting Tree algorithms for analysis. The dataset included 7814 visits from 2437 patients (average age 5.7 years, range 4 months to 21 years). Among them, 429 (11%) developed myopia. The models predicted myopia with up to 77% sensitivity and 92% specificity. This study introduces an AI-based method to identify children at higher risk for the onset of myopic refractive error, enabling personalized follow-up and treatment plans. Our approach offers caregivers an advanced screening tool to detect myopia risk using readily available data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.