ArticleNature communications2025
AI-powered spatiotemporal imputation and prediction of chlorophyll-a concentration in coastal ecosystems.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting spatiotemporal Chlorophyll-a (Chl_a) distributions is essential for diagnosing and analysing productivity and ecosystem health of coastal oceans. Yet, current tools remain inadequate for prognosing marine ecosystems through predicting spatiotemporal Chl_a distributions, particularly in the dynamic coastal ocean. Coupled physics-biogeochemical models struggle to resolve complex trophic interactions, while data-driven approaches are limited by incomplete satellite observations. We developed an advanced AI-powered spatiotemporal imputation and prediction (STIMP) model for predicting Chl_a in coastal ocean. STIMP adopts a novel paradigm that first imputes and subsequently predicts Chl_a across a broad spatiotemporal scale, resolving difficulties arising from incompletion, nonstationary temporal variations, and spatial heterogeneity of data through integrating specially designed modules. We demonstrated the STIMP's robust imputation and prediction of Chl_a in four representative global coastal oceans. STIMP reduced the imputation mean absolute error (MAE) by 45.90-81.39% compared with the data interpolating empirical orthogonal function method in geoscience and by 8.92-43.04% against leading AI methods. With accurate imputation, STIMP demonstrated superior predictive accuracy, achieving MAE reductions of 58.99% over biogeophysical models and 6.54-13.68% over AI benchmarks. STIMP offers a new approach for predicting oceans' Chl_a that typically have spatiotemporally limited data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.