ReviewInternational journal of laboratory hematology2025
Breaking Free From MCHC Interferences? French-Speaking Cellular Haematology Group (GFHC) Review of Causes, Rising Trends and Practical Solutions.
Review in International journal of laboratory hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Breaking Free From MCHC Interferences? French-Speaking Cellular Haematology Group (GFHC) Review of Causes, Rising Trends and Practical Solutions.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC) is determined by the ratio of haemoglobin concentration to haematocrit. Managing increased MCHC presents significant challenges, mainly due to variations in analytical methods and pathophysiological conditions. Depending on the haematological analyser (HA), MCHC can be measured directly or calculated. It is important that all people involved in hematocytometry must identify and correct artefacts to ensure accurate erythrocyte parameters. In order to harmonise and standardise haematology practices in all laboratories, the French-speaking Cellular Haematology Group (GFHC) has reviewed the interferences and pathophysiological situations that could increase MCHC, and the advice on how to manage cases of elevated MCHC. We will review current techniques, such as impedance and optical methods, for accurate determination of MCHC. We will also examine the interferences that can artificially increase MCHC; and the pathophysiological conditions responsible for such increases. Finally, we will present guidelines for the management of elevated MCHC, including strategies to bypass interferences and determine which erythrocyte parameters can be reliably reported, as well as the acceptable MCHC values for various pathophysiological variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.