Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40819911›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2025

Measuring health confidence: benefits to patients, clinicians and healthcare providers.

Tim Benson, Alex Benson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tim BensonR-Outcomes Ltd, Newbury, UK tim.benson@r-outcomes.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2101-1353
Alex BensonR-Outcomes Ltd, Newbury, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients need a high level of health confidence to manage their own care with success. However, health confidence is complex and changes throughout life.

methodsThe Health Confidence Score (HCS) is a measure of a patient's confidence and has four items covering their opinion of their health knowledge, ability to self-care, get help and participate in shared decision-making, plus an aggregate summary score. It is a short, easy-to-use measure with a low reading age.Data from about 5000 ratings are analysed, coming from anonymised patients living out of hospital.

resultsFindings show a highly significant improvement in health confidence between referral and follow-up after care and treatment. Health confidence is inversely related to the number of medications taken. The highest health confidence is in patients aged between 30 and 49. The lowest health confidence is in patients aged between 50 and 69. No significant difference in health confidence between male and female patients. Health confidence is a different concept from health status and personal well-being.

conclusionIntegrating HCS into routine care fosters patient-centred healthcare, promotes self-care and can reduce cost of care.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPatientsSelf ConceptSelf EfficacyAdultAgedFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSelf CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudesPatient-centred carePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPrimary careQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40819911
PMCPMC12359424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.