ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2025
Neural network for natural language processing to determine treatment urgency in an ophthalmology emergency department.
Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal natural language processing in ophthalmology: bridging clinical text and medical imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn an ophthalmology emergency department, determining treatment urgency is crucial for patient safety and the efficient use of resources. The aim of this study was to use artificial intelligence to develop a neural network and evaluate its accuracy in predicting treatment urgency.
methodsIn a retrospective study, a medical history questionnaire consisting of a free-text section and checkbox questions was given to 1715 patients on arrival and the responses were used as input data. The data were labelled as either emergency or non-urgent according to the patients' diagnosis and divided into a training and a test dataset. A bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) neural network for language processing was concatenated with a multilayer perceptron (MLP), and the result was processed by another MLP. Performance metrics were determined on the test dataset. Particular emphasis was placed on explainable artificial intelligence methods.
resultsThe combination of BERT and MLP achieved the highest F1 score of 0.81, with sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.58. The three ophthalmologists achieved F1 scores of 0.77, 0.75 and 0.73, respectively. Most of the input features that were identified by explainable artificial intelligence methods as being responsible for the network's decision correspond to clinically relevant features for the emergency/non-urgent decision.
conclusionsA neural network was developed to identify treatment urgency based on natural language data and checkbox questions which could complement the initial assessment. Future studies could focus on validation and improving accuracy, as well as integrating the network into workflows and discussing ethical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.