Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40819860›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Interventions for adult survivors discharged from the intensive care unit: a scoping review.

Tong Wu, Fanghong Yan, Guoli Zhang, Rongrong Zhao, Guotian Peng, Ruiyi Sun, Yuxia Ma, Lin Han, Jinping Liu

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tong Wu *Health Management Center, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gausu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5300-6942
Fanghong Yan *Lanzhou University School of Nursing, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5763-8820
Guoli ZhangLanzhou University School of Nursing, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Rongrong ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, Lanzhou University First Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Guotian PengLanzhou University School of Nursing, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Ruiyi SunLanzhou University School of Nursing, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yuxia MaLanzhou University School of Nursing, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Lin HanLanzhou University School of Nursing, Lanzhou, Gansu, China 857994119@qq.com LZU-hanlin@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7821-5253
Jinping LiuHealth Management Center, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gausu, China 857994119@qq.com LZU-hanlin@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo comprehensively map the available evidence on interventions implemented for adult survivors following discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU).

designA scoping review was conducted following the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was done across Embase, Medline, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Chinese Biomedical Database, Wanfang Data, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Chinese Clinical Trial Register, the China Master's Theses Full-text Database and the China Doctoral Dissertation Full-text Database. Literature published between January 2000 and May 2025 was included. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies published in English or the Chinese language on postdischarge interventions for adult ICU survivors were assessed. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted relevant data.

results39 studies were included, reporting 14 intervention components. Common strategies included ICU experience review, physical therapy and clinical assessment. Social, peer support and survivor participation interventions were less common. Most interventions were delivered within 1 week to 6 months postdischarge, via hospital visits or phone, with nearly half using multiple formats. Digital tools such as WeChat, telehealth and virtual reality (VR) were used in some studies; 15 studies involved caregivers, and 27 were nurse-led with multidisciplinary input. Interventions primarily targeted psychological well-being, quality of life and physical function, while social recovery and healthcare utilisation were less often addressed.

conclusionCurrent interventions are insufficiently addressing social, peer support and self-engagement needs. Future strategies should emphasise patient-centred, long-term care, with improved outcome measures and use of ICU-specific health-related quality of life tools. Integrating digital technologies could enhance access and continuity, supporting more sustainable post-ICU care.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPatient DischargeSurvivorsAdultCritical IllnessHumansQuality of LifeAdult intensive & critical careNursing CareReview

Identifiers

PMID40819860
PMCPMC12359423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.