Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40819852›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2025

Factors Affecting Nonresponse Among Female Participants in the Korea Nurses' Health Study: Longitudinal Cohort Survey Study.

Young Taek Kim, Chiyoung Cha, Gumhee Baek, Bohye Kim, Bo Mi Song, Joong-Yeon Lim, Hyun-Young Park, Juh Hyun Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Young Taek KimDivision for Gender-based Violence Research, Korean Women's Development Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1942-6998
Chiyoung ChaCollege of Nursing, Ewha Research Institute of Nursing Science, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0115-1348
Gumhee BaekCollege of Nursing, Ewha Research Institute of Nursing Science, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1999-0158
Bohye KimNursing Workforce Support Center, Korean Nursing Association, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5419-3467
Bo Mi SongDivision of Population Health Research, Department of Precision Medicine, National Institute of Health, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3181-5803
Joong-Yeon LimDivision of Population Health Research, Department of Precision Medicine, National Institute of Health, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7213-2614
Hyun-Young ParkNational Institute of Health, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6698-7368
Juh Hyun ShinSchool of Nursing, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8058-7195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe major drawback of a cohort study design is the loss to follow-up, which increases selection bias and threatens external validity, particularly in online surveys. It is important to identify factors beyond population or demographics that influence nonresponse rates in cohort studies.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine the nonresponse rate and associated factors over a 10-year follow-up period among female participants in the Korea Nurses' Health Study using data from the initial and subsequent surveys.

methodsThe Korea Nurses' Health Study recruited 20,613 female nurses in 2013 using simple random sampling. The participants were followed up 10 times through 2022. We identified the demographic, work-related, survey-related, and psychological characteristics of nonresponding nurses during the 10-year follow-up and compared them with those who continued to participate. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression models were used for the analysis.

resultsThe nonresponse rate of the follow-up surveys from the 2nd to the 11th survey varied between 25.5% (5258/20,613; second survey) and 61.2% (12,620/20,613; sixth survey). The influence of age, education, and the usability of survey websites on nonresponse lasted up to the 11th survey. Nurses in their 20s were less likely to respond to the follow-up surveys than those in their 30s. Those who had an associate degree and neutral feelings about the usability of the survey websites were less likely to respond to the follow-up surveys than those who were satisfied with the initial survey. The influence of geographical region, hospital size, and psychological factors-including stress, fatigue, and sleep disturbance-was evident from the second to the sixth survey.

conclusionsWhen designing and recruiting female nurse participants for community-based cohort studies, researchers should consider the factors that influence nonresponse and adopt tailored strategies based on demographic characteristics. In addition, improving the usability of survey websites is recommended to reduce nonresponses at follow-up in cohort studies involving female participants. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2024048.

Indexed as

NursesAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaSurveys and Questionnairescohort studiesfemalefollow-up studieslogistic modelslongitudinal studiesnonresponsenurses

Identifiers

PMID40819852
PMCPMC12583941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.