ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Ruptured dissection of the A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery treated by a flow diverter to cover the A1 origin: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceA1 dissection of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) is difficult to treat with endovascular treatment (EVT). There are many EVT options for treating A1 aneurysms. However, the use of a flow diverter (FD) to cover the origin of the ACA is uncommon. We such a case. CASE PRESENTATIONS: A 51-year-old male experienced subarachnoid hemorrhage. The patient's Hunt-Hess scale score was Grade II. Angiography revealed a ruptured A1 dissecting aneurysm. Under general anesthesia, FD was used to cover the origin of the ACA. Postoperatively, the patient had no new neurological deficits. During the one-year follow-up, the patient recovered well and returned to normal life. Angiography revealed that the A1 dissecting aneurysm regressed, and the right ACA was patent and thinner than before. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging did not reveal a brain infarction. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: FD can be used to cover the origin of the ACA to remodeled the proximal ACA and A1 aneurysm by flow diverting effect. During follow-up, the ruptured A1 dissection can be remodeled and regressed.
conclusionTherefore, for ruptured A1 dissection, a FD to cover the origin of the ACA may be a feasible therapeutic option. After this, A1 dissecting aneurysms can regress due to reduced blood flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.