Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40819457›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Comparative assessment of physico-chemical and fatty acid profiles of Moroccan Beldi and ROSS 308 chickens.

Mohammed Kamal Challioui, Soumaya Boukrouh, Siham Rouas, Aouatif Benali, Abderrahman Ziane, Taha Nour, Soufiane El Aayadi, Bouabid Badaoui, Xiaojun Liu, Abdelilah Araba

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohammed Kamal ChalliouiDepartment of Animal Production and Biotechnology, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, BP 6202, Rabat, Morocco; Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. Electronic address: m.challioui@iav.ac.ma.
Soumaya BoukrouhAfrican Sustainable Agriculture Research Institute (ASARI), Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Laâyoune, Morocco.
Siham RouasDepartment of Agro-Food Industry, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, BP 6202, Rabat, Morocco.
Aouatif BenaliFood Quality Laboratory, Food Technology Department, National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA), Rabat, Morocco.
Abderrahman ZianeDepartment of Animal Production and Biotechnology, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, BP 6202, Rabat, Morocco.
Taha NourDepartment of Animal Production and Biotechnology, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, BP 6202, Rabat, Morocco.
Soufiane El AayadiDepartment of Animal Production and Biotechnology, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, BP 6202, Rabat, Morocco.
Bouabid BadaouiAfrican Sustainable Agriculture Research Institute (ASARI), Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Laâyoune, Morocco; Department of Zoology, University of Mohammed V, BP 6202, Rabat, Morocco.
Xiaojun LiuDepartment of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Abdelilah ArabaDepartment of Animal Production and Biotechnology, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, BP 6202, Rabat, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of genotype, rearing system, and slaughter age on meat quality by comparing Moroccan indigenous Beldi chickens with commercial ROSS 308 broilers, with the aim of identifying strategies for optimizing nutritional properties. A total of 400 birds (200 Beldi and 200 ROSS) were reared either in intensive (10 birds/m², commercial diet) or extensive rearing systems (4 birds/m², outdoor foraging). ROSS chickens reared intensively were slaughtered at 4, 5, and 6 weeks, whereas the other experimental groups were slaughtered at 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Physico-chemical composition (dry matter, crude protein, ash , and fat content, and fatty acid (FA) profile, pH, cooking loss, color, and tenderness) were analyzed. Each experimental group included 100 birds, which were further divided into two subgroups of 50 birds each, serving as biological replicates. Data were analyzed using a mixed linear model with repeated measures on muscles. Subgroup-level analyses showed no significant differences, allowing data to be pooled for group-level comparisons. Results showed that Beldi chickens exhibited higher dry matter (28.25 vs. 25.48 %; p < 0.001) and crude protein (24.20 vs. 18.86 % FM; p < 0.001), but lower fat content (1.77 ± 0.10 % vs. 1.92 ± 0.09 % FM; p < 0.001) than ROSS chickens. Particularly in the extensive system and at later slaughter ages, Beldi chickens exhibited higher pH values across both the breast and thigh and firmer meat with higher shear force values. Under the intensive system, chicken meat was characterized by higher tenderness, lightness (L*), and yellowness (b*), but reduced redness (a*) and cooking loss, compared to the extensive system. The fatty acid (FA) profile also varied according to these factors, with meat from Beldi chickens characterized as healthier with lower SFA and MUFA content, but higher PUFA content. Moreover, according to health indices, Beldi chickens were characterized by higher PUFA/SFA, desirable fatty acids (DFA), essential fatty acids (EFA), and LA/ALA, and a lower thrombogenic index (TI) than ROSS chickens. Meat from the extensive system was characterized by higher total SFA and MUFA and lower PUFA. In summary, Beldi chickens, particularly when reared under extensive systems, produced meat with enhanced nutritional quality, whereas ROSS broilers provided more tender meat. Tailoring rearing strategies to each genotype's strengths can help optimize meat quality and meet diverse consumer preferences.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryChickensFatty AcidsMeatAnimal FeedAnimalsDietMaleMoroccoFatty AcidsFatty acid profileGenotypePhysicochemical compositionRearing systemSlaughter age

Identifiers

PMID40819457
PMCPMC12391597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.