Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40819344›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Exploratory evaluation of CA 15-3 × NLR score for predicting pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Emine Bihter Eniseler, Bartu Çetin, Ferhat Ekinci, Atike Pınar Erdoğan, Mustafa Şahbazlar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emine Bihter EniselerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey. drbihtereniseler@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5638-1816
Bartu ÇetinDepartment of General Surgery, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6491-5395
Ferhat EkinciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9317-942X
Atike Pınar ErdoğanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4859-7574
Mustafa ŞahbazlarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1857-593X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the predictive role of the CA 15-3 × neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) score in estimating pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

methodsA total of 330 patients treated with NACT between January 2015 and March 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. The CA 15-3 × neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) score was calculated by multiplying pre-treatment serum CA 15-3 levels with the NLR. pCR was defined as the absence of invasive carcinoma in both the breast and axillary lymph nodes after surgery. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of pCR, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine the optimal cutoff value for the composite score.

resultsThe median age of the study population was 48 years. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 42.4% of patients. The median CA 15-3 × NLR score was significantly lower in the pCR group compared to the non-pCR group (21 vs. 24; p = 0.033). ROC analysis revealed an optimal cutoff value of ≤ 32.7 (AUC = 0.568), with 81.05% sensitivity and 33.9% specificity. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, CA 15-3 × NLR ≤ 32.7 remained an independent predictor of pCR (OR 1.931; 95% CI 1.086-3.433; p = 0.025), along with N stage 2 and the absence of perineural invasion.

conclusionThe CA 15-3 × NLR score demonstrates modest prognostic potential in predicting treatment response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. While promising, these findings should be interpreted cautiously, and further validation is needed before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymphocytesNeoadjuvant TherapyNeutrophilsAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPathologic Complete ResponsePrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBreast cancerCA 15-3NLRpCR

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.