Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40819279›Full record

SynthesisJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2025

Vegan diet and nutritional status in infants, children and adolescents: A position paper based on a systematic search by the ESPGHAN Nutrition Committee.

Elvira Verduci, Jutta Kӧglmeier, Nadja Haiden, Laura Kivelä, Barbara de Koning, Susan Hill, Veronica Luque, Sissel J Moltu, Lorenzo Norsa, Miguel Saenz De Pipaon and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elvira VerduciMetabolic Disease Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Vittore Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2111-3111
Jutta KӧglmeierDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust London, London, UK.
Nadja HaidenDepartment of Neonatology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Laura KiveläCeliac Disease Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Barbara de KoningPaediatric Gastroenterology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Susan HillDepartment of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust London, London, UK.
Veronica LuqueSerra Hunter Fellow, Pediatric Nutrition Research Unit, Universitat Rovira i Virgili-IISPV, Tarragona, Spain.
Sissel J MoltuDepartment of Neonatal Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lorenzo NorsaDepartment of Pediatrics, Vittore Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Miguel Saenz De PipaonNeonatology Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Francesco SavinoDepartment of Pediatrics, Regina Margherita Children Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Jiri BronskyDepartment of Paediatrics, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vegan and other plant-based diets are becoming increasingly popular in the paediatric age group. There is limited evidence in the current medical literature to determine whether a vegan diet is adequate for children, since the currently available society position papers are based on narrative reviews and expert opinion. Updated evidence-based recommendations are needed to guide clinical practice. This position paper presents findings from a literature review performed using a systematic search strategy, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We analyzed the current evidence on the effect of vegan diet compared to omnivorous diet on body growth, nutritional adequacy and laboratory biomarkers in infants, children and adolescents. Observational studies, cohort studies and clinical trials published over the last 15 years in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were retrieved. Our position paper aims to update the evidence for or against the adequacy of a vegan diet in infants, children and adolescents and to provide evidence-based recommendations. A total of 10 articles were accepted and included in the final review, providing information on approximately 1500 children following a vegan diet. Several articles assessed more than one outcome: seven addressed body growth, five evaluated nutritional adequacy and five examined laboratory biomarkers. To complement the primary data, three systematic reviews and meta-analyses were also included. Current evidence is inconclusive to determine whether a strictly vegan diet supports normal childhood growth, although no significant differences in height or body mass index z-scores were observed compared to omnivorous peers. We recommend that dietary intake, growth and nutritional status should be regularly monitored in vegan children. Focusing on dietary intakes (e.g., protein, omega-3, calcium and iron) and ensuring supplementation with specific micronutrients, including vitamin B12, is essential during paediatric age when following a strict vegan diet. Clinical research, well-designed prospective studies and high-quality trials are required to address current research gaps.

Indexed as

Child Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaDiet, VeganNutritional StatusAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantgrowthmicronutrientsnutritional intakeplant‐based dietvitamin B12

Identifiers

PMID40819279
PMCPMC12580465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.