ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2025
A Computer Vision and Machine Learning Approach to Classify Views in Distal Radius Radiographs.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated deep learning detection of orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in maxillary incisors on panoramic radiographs.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in computer vision and machine learning have augmented the ability to analyze orthopedic radiographs. A critical but underexplored component of this process is the accurate classification of radiographic views and localization of relevant anatomical regions, both of which can impact the performance of downstream diagnostic models. This study presents a deep learning object detection model and mobile application designed to classify distal radius radiographs into standard views-anterior-posterior (AP), lateral (LAT), and oblique (OB)- while localizing the anatomical region most relevant to distal radius fractures. A total of 1593 deidentified radiographs were collected from a single institution between 2021 and 2023 (544 AP, 538 LAT, and 521 OB). Each image was annotated using Labellerr software to draw bounding boxes encompassing the region spanning from the second digit MCP joint to the distal third of the radius, with annotations verified by an experienced orthopedic surgeon. A YOLOv5 object detection model was fine-tuned and trained using a 70/15/15 train/validation/test split. The model achieved an overall accuracy of 97.3%, with class-specific accuracies of 99% for AP, 100% for LAT, and 93% for OB. Overall precision and recall were 96.8% and 97.5%, respectively. Model performance exceeded the expected accuracy from random guessing (p < 0.001, binomial test). A Streamlit-based mobile application was developed to support clinical deployment. This automated view classification step reduces feature space by isolating only the relevant anatomy. Focusing subsequent models on the targeted region can minimize distraction from irrelevant areas and improve the accuracy of downstream fracture classification models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.