ArticleScientific reports2025
The association between dietary antioxidant index with tumor size, proliferation marker, and the odds of breast cancer in Iranian women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Serum nutrient profile and dietary patterns as predictors of tumor grade and molecular subtype in breast cancer patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between the dietary antioxidant index (DAI) with pathological markers (tumor size and Ki-67 marker) and the odds of breast cancer in Iranian women. In this matched case-control study, 155 women with breast cancer and 155 cancer-free women (18-70 years old) were recruited from Iran, using a convenience sampling method. Control participants were frequency-matched to cases by 5-year age-group. DAI score was calculated based on dietary data obtained from a 168-item FFQ. Linear regression with adjustment for confounding factors was used to determine the relationship between DAI and pathological markers. Logistic regression, adjusted for confounding factors, was employed to investigate the odds ratio (OR) of breast cancer according to the quantitative and qualitative (quartiles) scores of the DAI, with 95% CI. Logistic regression subgroup according to menopausal status was also performed. A non-significant inverse relationship was observed between DAI score and Ki-67 marker in the crude model and the adjusted models 2 and 3 (p ≥ 0.05). In the crude model, in the second quartile, the odds of breast cancer was significantly reduced compared to the first quartile (OR: 0.50, CI: 0.26-0.96). However, after adjusting for confounding factors in model 2, the odds of breast cancer decreased significantly in the second and third quartiles compared to the first quartile (p < 0.05). Also, by entering the DAI as a quantitative variable in model 3 of logistic regression, a significant decrease in the odds of breast cancer was observed (p = 0.03). In the postmenopausal stage, the odds of breast cancer in the second quartile decreased significantly compared to the first quartile in the crude model. Also, in model 3, after adjusting for confounding factors, the odds ratio of breast cancer in the second and third quartiles was significantly reduced compared to the first quartile (p < 0.05). This study suggests that a higher dietary antioxidant intake, as measured by the DAI, may be associated with a lower risk of breast cancer in Iranian women and this relationship is more significant in the postmenopausal stage. These findings highlight the potential benefits of dietary antioxidants and warrant further investigation into their role in breast cancer prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.