ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025
Impact of Protocol Amendments, Personnel Experience and Social Determinants of Health on Study Protocol Adherence in Clinical Trials with Combination Products.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe amendments to the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) E8 guidelines were introduced to enhance clinical trial quality, patient safety, and efficiency through a more patient-centric, risk-based approach. This study investigates the impact of various study risk factors such as protocol amendments, informed consent changes, protocol complexity, and social determinants of health (SDOH) on protocol deviations and patient retention in clinical trials involving combination products.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 14 clinical trials with 202 enrolled subjects was conducted. Key risk indicators (KRIs) such as protocol amendments, amendments triggering informed consent changes, study staff experience, and clinical trial phase were evaluated for their association with protocol deviations. The analysis also explored the influence of social factors, including age, gender, race, insurance type, and travel distance on protocol adherence.
resultsStudy revealed that longer study participation was associated with an increased number of protocol deviations (p = 0.0003), while no significant associations were found between protocol deviations and demographic factors (p = 0.4039 for gender; p = 0.40650 for age), insurance type (p = 0.0640), or complexity scores (p = 0.7798). The findings highlight the importance of effective informed consent processes, study staff training, and risk management strategies to minimize protocol deviations and enhance data integrity in clinical trials.
conclusionwhile larger numbers of participant were associated with more deviations, site preparedness and patient compliance can mitigate these risks, underscoring the need for robust quality management systems in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.