ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Perspectives of medical staff on respiratory management with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From theory to practice: implementing an education bundle for neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in the intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to examine physicians' and nurses' perspectives of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) and electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) in management of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants for further improvement of respiratory management and care. STUDY
designAn anonymous survey about the effectiveness, benefits, and challenges of NAVA and Edi were conducted from December 2021 to February 2022 in 29 institutions in Japan.
resultA total of 497 responses (by 148 physicians and 349 nurses) from 22 institutions were analyzed. Most medical staff found NAVA and non-invasive NAVA beneficial, particularly for improving oxygenation and ventilation, though some physicians voiced concerns about potential respiratory condition worsening. Edi was considered important for assessing the respiratory status and facilitating communication between healthcare providers.
conclusionWhile many physicians and nurses consider NAVA to have promising advantages for respiratory management of ELBW infants, its implementation requires comprehensive training and education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40819138What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.