ArticleScientific data2025
A Comprehensive Polish Medical Speech Dataset for Enhancing Automatic Medical Dictation.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ADMEDTAGGER: an annotation framework for distillation of expert knowledge for the Polish medical language.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Developing an AI platform for voice-input medical records in Polish: a digital application for optimisation of physicians' workload.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pre-trained models have become widely adopted for their strong zero-shot performance, often minimizing the need for task-specific data. However, specialized domains like medical speech recognition still benefit from tailored datasets. We present ADMEDVOICE, a novel Polish medical speech dataset, collected using a high-quality text corpus and diverse recording conditions to reflect real-world scenarios. The dataset includes domain-specific vocabulary such as drug names and illnesses, with nearly 15 hours of audio from 28 speakers, including noisy environments. Additionally, we release two enhanced versions: one anonymized for privacy-sensitive use and another synthetic version created via text-to-speech, totaling over 83 hours and nearly 50,000 samples. Evaluating the Whisper model, we observe a 24.03 WER on our test set. Fine-tuning with human recordings reduces WER to 15.47, and incorporating anonymized and synthetic data further lowers it to 13.91. We open-source the dataset, fine-tuned model, and code on Kaggle to support continued research in medical speech recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.