Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40819115›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2025

Employer Retention Profiles of Workers with Physical Disabilities.

Heerak Choi, Jasin Wong, Angelika Kudla, Deborah S Crown, Bishan Yang, Emily J Dinelli, Pamela Capraro, Robert Trierweiler, Allen W Heinemann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Heerak ChoiFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. heerak.choi@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2417-9151
Jasin WongDepartment of Special Education, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-6393
Angelika KudlaCenter for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2849-0011
Deborah S CrownCenter for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9816-7057
Bishan YangFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2924-3228
Emily J DinelliFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2959-9259
Pamela CapraroCenter for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2954-1655
Robert TrierweilerCenter for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4693-2458
Allen W HeinemannFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2782-7326

Funding

ACL HHS 90RTEM0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to define parsimonious, non-overlapping subgroups of employers based on perceived facilitators and challenges in retaining workers with physical disabilities. Additionally, we sought to compare company characteristics, disability-related supports and practices, and job accommodation provision across employer subgroups.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional observational study using an online survey among 2,000 employers in the United States. Data analysis included 1,641 employers who hired at least one worker with a physical disability. Data analysis methods included latent profile analysis, independent t test, and chi-square or Fisher's exact test.

resultsWe identified two subgroups of employers, characterized by high facilitator (n = 360) and high challenge groups (n = 1,281). The high facilitator group consists of employers who perceive greater facilitators than challenges in retaining workers with disabilities, while the high challenge group consists of employers who perceive greater challenges than facilitators. A greater proportion of respondents in the high facilitator group were from service-providing companies, had fewer than 500 employees, and were CEOs or owners, compared to those in the high challenge group. Additionally, the high facilitator group reported higher rates of hiring workers with disabilities over the past 12 months, greater implementation of disability-related supports and practices, and greater provision of job accommodations than the high challenge group.

conclusionEmployers can enhance the retention of workers with physical disabilities by promoting facilitators and addressing challenges, strengthening disability-related supports and practices, and providing job accommodations. Future research should validate these findings and develop targeted interventions.

Indexed as

EmploymentPersonnel retentionPersons with disabilities

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.