ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced mechanical, thermal, and wear performance of halloysite nanotube infused carbon fiber epoxy composites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) of the hybrid epoxy/carbon-fibers nanocomposites for satellite structures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work explores the mechanical, thermal, and tribological characteristics of carbon fabric reinforced epoxy (CF-Ep) composites filled with halloysite nanotubes (HNT). The mechanical properties were evaluated, including hardness, interlaminar shear strength (ILSS), tensile strength, and flexural strength. The enhanced curing and even dispersion of HNTs in the epoxy matrix were validated by DSC, FTIR, and SEM measurements. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) demonstrated improved thermal stability and damping, especially for the 0.75 wt.% HNT composite. Tribological performance was investigated utilizing a pin-on-disc configuration (60 N, 3 m/s) and silica sand (212 µm, 30 N, 2.38 m/s) under three-body abrasion and dry sliding wear, respectively. Hardness was highest at 1.75 wt.% HNT, and wear resistance and mechanical performance were best at 0.75 wt.% HNT composite. Surface damage, including matrix separation, micro-ploughing, and fragmentation, was lessened in 0.75 wt.% HNT composites, according to scanning electron microscopy worn surfaces. Using Minitab 17 and the Taguchi approach, wear experiments was created using an L16 orthogonal array. There were four levels of variation in three factors: load (10-40 N), abrading distance (250-1000 m), and HNT content (0-2.75 wt.%). The most important variables influencing wear volume loss were found to be load + distance and load + filler interactions using ANOVA and regression analysis. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that H0.75% HNT-filled composites had the best resistance to wear because they showed less surface damage mechanisms, such as fragmentation, micro-ploughing, and matrix detachment, when they were worn-out by dry sliding or abrasion. Overall, by strengthening interfacial bonding, improving load transfer, and creating a protective tribolayer that decreased material loss and surface damage during abrasion, HNTs improved mechanical and wear properties. Specifically, the 0.75 wt.% HNT composite showed outstanding heat stability and wear resistance, which made it a good option for high-performance uses such as power plant chute and automobile liners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.