ArticleCommunications psychology2025
Social inequity disrupts reward-based learning.
Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Through reward-based learning, people learn which actions generate which outcomes in which situations. What happens to human reward-based learning when outcomes are shared? Here we show that learning is impacted by inequity in the distribution of rewards (self-other) and others' identity. In three experiments, participants could learn how different actions, in response to different stimuli, generated different monetary rewards, each split between the participant and a member of a particular social group. Overall, participants learned more slowly and less successfully when they received a smaller (vs larger) share of the total reward. Stereotypes about the partner's social group additionally modulated learning rates when cognitive load was reduced, with lower perceived warmth or competence hampering learning from the partner's share. Computational modeling showed participants' learning was best explained by adapting the standard reinforcement learning model to account for stereotypes and inequity information, demonstrating that social context modulates non-social learning processes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.