ArticleScientific reports2025
Fabrication and characterization of carbon and glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites by fused filament fabrication.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An Investigation into the Friction Stir Spot Welding Behavior of 3D-Printed Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polylactic Acid.Polymers · 2026Article
- Effect of Print Orientation on the Tribological Behavior of a Steel Powder-Modified Thermoplastic.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is a widely used additive manufacturing (AM) technology due to its cost-effectiveness, material efficiency, and the ability to produce complex geometries. However, the mechanical limitations of thermoplastic materials limit their use in broader functional applications. In this study, PLA and ABS thermoplastics were reinforced with 1%, 3%, and 5% carbon fiber (CF) and glass fiber (GF) to improve their mechanical performance. The results showed that 3% reinforcement provided the most balanced performance overall. The highest tensile strength was 29.67 MPa in the ABS + 3%CF samples, while the highest tensile strength among the PLA composites was measured as 17.47 MPa in the PLA + 3%GF samples. The highest impact strength was obtained with 1% reinforcement for ABS and 5% reinforcement (0.47 J) for PLA-GF. While GF reinforcement increased stiffness in PLA, 5% reinforcement in both matrices caused a performance decrease due to fiber agglomeration. SEM-EDS and FTIR analyses supported optimal binding and dispersion at 1-3% reinforcement ratios. The increased strength, toughness, and structural integrity of the resulting 3% reinforced composites suggest that these materials are potential candidates for applications requiring lightweight and durable parts, such as those in the defense industry. Future studies are recommended to evaluate long-term performance criteria such as fatigue and environmental resistance, and to improve fiber distribution for higher reinforcement ratios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.