ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Beyond the guidelines: outcomes of extremely delayed hip fracture surgery in elderly.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHip fractures are a significant public health issue among the elderly. While early surgical intervention's effects on morbidity are well-documented, the impact of delayed surgery on mortality and morbidity is less understood. This study aims to examine the medium-term morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent delayed surgery with an average preoperative waiting period of 14 days. MATERIALS: This retrospective study used data from hospital records, Social Security Institution death records, and telephone surveys. Included were patients aged 65 and older with femoral neck or pertrochanteric fractures. Excluded were those younger than 65, with pathological or subtrochanteric fractures, and without adequate preoperative and postoperative follow-up. Preoperative waiting time, mobilization status, ASA score, NLR, and mortality rates were recorded. Postoperative follow-ups occurred at 2, 6, and 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and annually. Various statistical methods investigated the impact of preoperative waiting time on mortality and mobility.
resultsA total of 289 hip fracture surgeries were followed for an average of 5.1 years (range: 0-8.5 years). The mean age was 79 (range: 65-100), with 174 females (60.2%) and 115 males (39.8%). The average preoperative waiting time was 14 days (range: 0-49 days). ROC analysis indicated the critical mortality threshold was 12 days. The one-month cumulative mortality rate was 6% for patients operated on within the first 12 days and 11% for those operated on after 12 days. One-year cumulative mortality rates were 21% for patients operated on within 12 days and 39% for those operated on after 12 days.
conclusionThis study confirms the relationship between surgical delay and increased mortality rates in hip fracture patients, with a 12-day threshold for high mortality risk exceeding typical reports. While no statistically significant relationship was found between preoperative waiting time and ambulation, one-third of postoperative patients could walk without support and nearly half could not walk at all. Despite being retrospective, this study with a large patient population demonstrates the significant impact of surgical delay on mortality and morbidity rates in hip fracture patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.