ArticleScientific reports2025
Experimental investigation of the properties of collapsible soil stabilized by colloidal silica.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collapsible soils pose significant geotechnical challenges due to their tendency to exhibit high strength under natural moisture conditions but undergo substantial settlement upon wetting. To address this issue, various stabilizing agents, including lime, cement, silicates, resins, and acids, have been explored. This study investigates the effectiveness of colloidal silica (CS), a low-viscosity solution capable of forming a gel, as a stabilizing agent. Its unique properties enable it to be injected into or mixed directly with soil, offering versatility in application. The behavior of CS-stabilized collapsible soil was evaluated through collapse potential and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was also conducted to analyze microstructural changes in untreated and CS-treated soils. Colloidal silica was added at concentrations of 3, 5, 7, and 10% by weight of dry soil, with curing times of one, 7, 14, and 28 days. Collapse potential tests were performed at relative compactions of 80 and 85%, while UCS tests used a relative compaction of 95%. Results indicated that colloidal silica significantly reduced soil collapsibility while enhancing stiffness and UCS without inducing brittleness. A 5% CS concentration was optimal, reducing collapsibility from severe to negligible. Increased relative compaction (80 to 85%) further decreased collapsibility, whereas higher inundation stress increased it. These improvements are attributed to pore filling by colloidal silica, which enhances inter-particle bonding and structural integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.