ArticleScientific reports2025
Predictive modeling of coagulant dosing in drilling wastewater treatment using artificial neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to water resource limitations and the environmental challenges associated with wastewater generated during oil and gas well drilling processes, the treatment and reuse of drilling wastewater have become essential. In Iran, most drilling wastewater treatment is conducted chemically using coagulant and flocculant agents, typically managed by on-site jar testing, which requires high technical expertise and can be time-consuming and prone to human error. Replacing this conventional approach with artificial intelligence techniques can significantly accelerate the process and reduce operational inaccuracies. In this study, data from 200 drilling waste management reports across various wells in the West Karun oilfields were collected, including input wastewater characteristics, dosages of polyaluminum chloride (coagulant) and polyacrylamide (flocculant), and the quality of the treated effluent. After conducting sensitivity analysis to select relevant input-output parameters, predictive models were developed using Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), a hybrid PSO-RNN model, Extreme Learning Machines (ELMs), and Random Forest (RF). Each model was trained, tested, and validated, and their performance was evaluated using correlation coefficient (R) and root mean square error (RMSE). The validation results showed that for coagulant prediction, the RF model achieved the highest R value (0.89), while for flocculant prediction, the ELMs model outperformed others with an R value of 0.95. In terms of error, the ELMs model demonstrated the lowest RMSE values for both coagulant (0.13) and flocculant (0.10) predictions. ELM and Random Forest showed strong predictive performance (R ≈ 0.95, RMSE ≈ 0.10 g/m³), with high NSE (> 0.85) and low AIC (< 110), confirming model robustness and stability through cross-validation. Overall, Among the four models tested, the ELMs model demonstrated relatively strong predictive performance in both coagulant and flocculant estimation tasks, though limitations in capturing extreme values remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.