ArticleScientific reports2025
Fish feeding behavior recognition via lightweight two stage network and satiety experiments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the advancement of industrial aquaculture, intelligent fish feeding has become pivotal in reducing feed and labor costs while enhancing fish welfare. Computer vision, as a non-invasive and efficient approach, has made significant strides in this domain. However, current research still faces three major issues: qualitative labels lead to models that produce only qualitative outputs; redundant information in images causes interference; and the high complexity of models hinders real-time application. To address these challenges, this study innovatively proposes the quantification of fish feeding behaviors through satiety experiments, enabling the generation of quantitative data labels. A two-stage recognition network is then designed to eliminate redundant information and enhance model performance. This network utilizes pose detection to extract key features, while a graph convolutional network (GCN) effectively models the topological relationships between fish posture and distribution, achieving a satiety classification accuracy of 98.1%. Furthermore, to reduce model complexity, lightweight RepSELAN and SPPSF modules were developed, resulting in a 31.4% reduction in parameters and a 26.2% decrease in computational load, with only a 0.11% decrease in mAP(B) and a 0.95% increase in mAP(P). Compared with existing methods, this approach outperforms conventional models in both accuracy and efficiency, providing a novel and efficient model foundation for developing intelligent feeding strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.