Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40818890›Full record

ReviewAdvances in kidney disease and health2025

Sex and Gender Disparities in Kidney Transplantation.

Mythri Shankar, Silvi Shah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in kidney disease and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mythri ShankarDepartment of Nephrology, Institute of Nephro-urology, Bengaluru, India.
Silvi ShahDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: shah2sv@ucmail.uc.edu.

Funding

Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease and Optimal Coronary Revascularization in Dialysis PatientsK23HL151816 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI SHAH, SILVI · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL151816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex refers to biological traits, while gender involves socially constructed roles and behaviors. Globally, women face disparities in access to kidney transplants, and outcomes, driven by sociocultural and systemic factors. Females have a higher prevalence of kidney disease, start dialysis at lower glomerular filtration rates, and receive lower dialysis doses than males. Fewer females are refered for kidney transplants than males, and females have lower rates of preemptive transplantation than males. There are significant disparities in waitlisting, with fewer females being placed on kidney transplant waiting list and females having longer median wait time, as compared to males. Studies indicate variable outcomes in kidney allograft survival in males and females due to differences in immune response, hormonal effects, and nephron mismatch. Socioeconomic, cultural, and psychosocial factors exacerbate these gaps, alongside healthcare provider biases. Females constitute over 75% of donors, often reflecting caregiving roles. Addressing these disparities requires equitable organ allocation systems, strengthened donor exchange programs, financial support, and culturally sensitive education. Research and policy reforms remain critical to bridging the sex and gender gap in kidney transplantation.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleSex FactorsWaiting ListsDeceased donorGenderKidney transplantLiving donorSex

Identifiers

PMID40818890
PMCPMC13231488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.