ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: A report of two cases with distinct features.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceSclerosing stromal tumor (SST) is a rare, benign ovarian neoplasm affecting women in their second and third decades. Despite being benign, it often mimics malignant ovarian tumors on imaging, making preoperative diagnosis challenging. Recognizing SST is crucial for appropriate surgical planning, particularly in fertility-preserving interventions for young women. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: A 28-year-old multiparous woman presented with abdominal distension and oligomenorrhea. Ultrasound showed a left ovarian mass. Laparotomy with left salpingo-oophorectomy revealed SST features, including pseudolobulation and thin-walled vessels. Her postoperative recovery was uneventful with normalized menstrual cycles. Case 2: A 19-year-old nulliparous woman presented with abdominal pain, distension, and mild dyspnea. Imaging showed a right ovarian mass with ascites. Laparotomy with right oophorectomy revealed a solid yellowish mass confirmed as SST on histopathology. She recovered well with no recurrence at 6 months. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: SST accounts for less than 6 % of sex cord-stromal tumors, characterized by pseudolobulation, heterogeneous cellularity, and vascularity. Differential diagnoses include fibroma, thecoma, and granulosa cell tumor. While imaging may suggest SST, histopathology is definitive. Surgical excision is curative, and fertility-sparing options are viable for young patients.
conclusionSST should be considered in the differential diagnosis of solid ovarian masses in young women. Although imaging supports preoperative suspicion, histological evaluation is definitive. Conservative surgery ensures an excellent prognosis and fertility preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.