ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Native vs. synthetic grafts in lower extremity vascular trauma: Lessons from two rural case presentations.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTrauma to the extremities is a common injury that demands a comprehensive evaluation of vascular structures. Prompt identification and timely intervention improve clinical outcomes; severe injuries frequently lead to complications and potential limb loss. Revascularization delays greater than 8 h post-injury markedly increase amputation risk. This report describes successful management strategies for lower extremity vascular injuries by comparing native and synthetic graft applications. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Two patients with lower extremity vascular injuries are detailed. Case 1: a 54-year-old female with blunt trauma to the right leg that resulted in femoropopliteal occlusion successfully underwent a saphenous vein graft (SVG) bypass. Case 2: a 28-year-old female presented 27 h post-road traffic collision with a left thigh injury and total transection of the superficial femoral artery. Revascularization was achieved via femoropopliteal extra-anatomic bypass using an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) vascular graft. Both patients were discharged 2 weeks post-surgery with favorable outcomes. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Case 1 emphasizes the importance of prompt diagnosis and intervention. Case 2 demonstrates limb salvage potential despite delayed presentation. The choice between autologous SVGs (superior biocompatibility, long-term patency) and synthetic ePTFE grafts (readily available, higher re-occlusion risk) dictates postoperative management, particularly in terms of anticoagulation therapy.
conclusionsThis report illustrates successful open surgical bypasses for femoropopliteal occlusion and ruptured superficial femoral artery. It underscores the importance of timely intervention and differing postoperative management methods for autologous SVGs and synthetic ePTFE grafts. An algorithmic approach to diagnosis and treatment, alongside surgeon comprehension of therapeutic options, is paramount for optimal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.