SynthesisMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2025
De-epithelialized free gingival graft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orodispersible lidocaine film in palatine nerve block: a randomized, controlled and blind clinical trial.Odontology · 2026Article
- Article
- Two-Step Palatal Shield Technique Using Flowable Composite Resin for Donor-Site Protection Following De-Epithelialized Free Gingival Grafting: A Case Report Illustrating a Novel Technique.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe best technique to harvest gingival graft to treat gingival recessions (GR) remains a topic of ongoing debate. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of de-epithelialized free gingival graft (DFGG) compared to subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the treatment of GR Miller Class I and II or Cairo type I. MATERIAL AND
methodsFive databases were searched up to June 2024 to include randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical effects of DFGG with SCTG in the treatment of GR. The random effects model of mean differences was used to determine GR, and gain in keratinized tissue width (KTW), gingival thickness (GT) and clinical attachment level (CAL). The risk ratio was used to complete root coverage (CRC) at 6 and 12 months.
resultsFive RCTs including 183 and 111 GR at 6 and 12 months were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in GR reduction, gain in KTW, GT, CRC or CAL between groups at 6 and 12 months.
conclusionsAt 12 months, the clinical results of DFGG were similar to those of SCTG in the treatment of GR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.