Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40818128›Full record

SynthesisMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2025

Suppurative infections after lower third molar surgery: a systematic review.

R Pippi, U Giuliani

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R PippiDepartment of Odontostomatological and Maxillo Facial Sciences Via Caserta 6, 00161, Rome roberto.pippi@uniroma1.it.
U Giuliani

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter lower third molar surgery, suppurative infections can occur. They can spread into adjacent tissues, toward superficial mucosal or skin planes or toward deep facial and neck fascial spaces. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe 2020 PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed. A literature search was conducted, without initial time limit, in the Medline database, via Pubmed (MEDLINE), and SCOPUS. For the analysis of statistical significance, the hypothesis test on the difference between means with unknown variances was used.

resultsEleven articles met the inclusion criteria. The total number of extractions taken from the articles included in the review is 7363, with a 5.35% total incidence of purulent infections. The incidence of purulent infections was found significantly higher in cases in which antibiotic prophylaxis was not performed.

conclusionsAlthough lower third molar extraction is the most frequently performed oral surgical procedure, little has been written about post-operative purulent infections, in relation to risk factors, involved spaces, and performed therapies, so to be able to identify preventive and therapeutic behaviors based on scientific evidence. Antibiotic prophylaxis is the only variable which resulted in determining a significative statistical reduction in the incidence of purulent infection after lower third molar surgery.

Indexed as

Molar, ThirdSurgical Wound InfectionTooth ExtractionAntibiotic ProphylaxisHumansIncidenceRisk FactorsSuppuration

Identifiers

PMID40818128
PMCPMC12395593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.