ArticleMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2025
Profile and satisfaction of oral pathology/medicine postgraduates: a national multicenter study.
Article in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the profile and professional satisfaction of postgraduate students in Oral Pathology (OP) and Oral Medicine (OM) enrolled in Stricto sensu programs across various Brazilian institutions. MATERIAL AND
methodsA cross-sectional, multicenter study surveyed 139 students from seven universities using a digital questionnaire with 29 questions on sociodemographic, motivations, and satisfaction. Data collection occurred between August and October 2024.
resultsMost participants were female (63.3%), aged between 25 and 30 years (59.7%), and enrolled in doctoral programs (55.4%). The most important reasons for pursuing postgraduate studies were knowledge enhancement (86.3%), personal satisfaction (84.9%), and financial factors (51.1%). Despite high satisfaction with their programs, and most of them (64%) feeling prepared for the job market, many students felt that job opportunities in OP/OM were limited. Older students reported greater satisfaction with the program (p = 0.020). Ethnicity influenced satisfaction with the pedagogical project (p < 0.001). Students with partners were more satisfied with the accessibility of the faculty (p = 0.004), as were those with children (p < 0.001). Job prospects were associated with satisfaction in several aspects, including the program (p < 0.001), the pedagogical project (p < 0.001) and the physical infrastructure (p = 0.034).
conclusionsDemographic factors and personal perspectives were associated with students' satisfaction with their postgraduate programs. Addressing employment opportunities and improving program infrastructures, pedagogical projects, and access to advisors/professors could further enhance students' satisfaction and career outcomes in OP/OM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.