Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40818093›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026

Importance of R

Tereza Beatriz Oliveira Assunção, Nashwan Naji, Jeff Snyder, Peter Seres, Gregg Blevins, Penelope Smyth, Alan H Wilman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Importance of RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tereza Beatriz Oliveira AssunçãoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0423-7809
Nashwan NajiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6501-9042
Jeff SnyderDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5043-2202
Peter SeresDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Gregg BlevinsDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Penelope SmythDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Alan H WilmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

Alberta InnovatesCIHRNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the importance of R

methodsThe effects of R

resultsErrors in R

conclusionParamagnetic and diamagnetic outputs of susceptibility source separation methods have variable responses to R

Indexed as

BrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAlgorithmsBrain MappingFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsR2 mapsource separationsusceptibilitytransverse relaxation mapping

Identifiers

PMID40818093
PMCPMC12620178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.