Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40818082›Full record

SynthesisCriminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH2025

A Systematic Review of Substance Misuse Treatment Processes and Outcomes as Implemented in Prisons for Men in the UK.

Kim Barnett, Noor Butt, Rosie Allen, Pauline Goodlad, Anne Krayer, Adam O'Neill, Peter Huxley, Catherine Robinson, Emily Peckham, Rob Poole

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kim BarnettCentre for Mental Health and Society, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3611-7355
Noor ButtSocial Care and Society, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rosie AllenSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Bolton, Bolton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7903-6094
Pauline GoodladJohn Spalding Library, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3413-8522
Anne KrayerCentre for Mental Health and Society, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1503-1734
Adam O'NeillDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9860-8545
Peter HuxleyCentre for Mental Health and Society, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5152-8030
Catherine RobinsonSocial Care and Society, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7240-7107
Emily PeckhamCentre for Mental Health and Society, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9377-1968
Rob PooleCentre for Mental Health and Society, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7914-3981

Funding

Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board F010242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith a rising prison population, a substantial portion of whom are identified as substance misusers, it is important to understand the availability of treatment pathways, their successes and areas for improvement. Given the likely importance of national factors in criminal justice and substance use service provision, we chose to focus on one country.

aimTo review substance misuse treatment and outcomes for such treatments as implemented in British prisons for men.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods systematic review, searching Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Sociology Collection, Web of Science Core Collection and Social Science Premium Collection between 1 January 2000 and 5 June 2024. Included were empirical, peer-reviewed studies of processes and outcomes of UK male prison-based substance misuse programmes. Primary outcomes included changes in substance use, withdrawal symptoms and experiences of interventions, whereas secondary outcomes encompassed quality of life, locus of control and mental health. Because of study design heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not possible. Analysis followed JBI methodology with a convergent synthesis.

resultsFourteen studies were included: 8 qualitative, 5 quantitative studies of which 3 were randomised control trials (RCTs) and 1 mixed-methods study, with a combined sample of 4037 participants engaged in opioid substitute treatment (OST) and/or psychosocial interventions. Four key themes emerged: the power of purposeful activity, strengthening support systems, bridging patient needs with treatment plans and, for those in opiate programmes, experiences and engagement with opioid substitution treatments.

conclusionsParticipants articulated diverse treatment needs, highlighting the necessity of individualised and tailored reduction or maintenance plans. Treatment requires a comprehensive approach with the aim of facilitating effective social integration.

Indexed as

PrisonersPrisonsSubstance-Related DisordersHumansMaleUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40818082
PMCPMC12574697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.