ArticlePsycho-oncology2025
Comparative Effectiveness of Psychosocial Protective Factors for Prostate Cancer Survivorship - A UK Biobank Study.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Effectiveness of Psychosocial Protective Factors for Prostate Cancer Survivorship - A UK Biobank Study.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigates psychosocial and lifestyle factors to improve survival outcomes in prostate cancer patients.
methodsFrom the UK Biobank cohort, 13,110 male prostate cancer subjects were analysed to examine the relationship between psychosocial and lifestyle factors and survival with a mean follow-up of 14.2 years from recruitment.
resultsParticipation in sports club or gym (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.91, p < 0.005), religious groups (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.94, p < 0.005) and other group activity (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97, p = 0.01) were associated with lower mortality risk in our analysis, after adjusting for age, deprivation and comorbidities, followed by. In contrast, neither the pub or social club nor the adult education class demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit. A modest dose-response relationship between the number of social activities engaged in and mortality risk reduction is observed. There were no differential benefits in alcohol intake, while smoking demonstrated a graded risk increase in mortality (HR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.51-2.0, p < 0.005 in current smokers; HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.1-1.32, p < 0.005 in previous smokers) compared to never smokers. Having close and frequent confidants (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.92, p < 0.005 for daily) also confers benefits to survival.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that participation in sports club or gym, engaging in religious groups and other group activities, forming good health habits such as smoking cessation, and having people to confide in regularly is associated with reduced mortality risk in prostate cancer patients. These findings highlight the importance of integrating psychosocial resilience, health behaviour optimisation, and spiritual engagement into survivorship care. The hierarchical risk reduction profile supports prioritising interventions targeting modifiable health behaviours, spiritual/social support, and group activities. While religious participation is associated with notable survival benefits, this study recognises the complex interplay of cultural, social, and personal factors influencing engagement in such activities. These findings advocate for stratified survivorship care models prioritising engagement modalities with dual physiological, psychosocial, and spiritual benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.