SynthesisEnvironmental management2025
Citizen Science for Water Quality Monitoring: Analyzing Key Parameters, Success Factors, and Research Gaps for Aquaculture.
Synthesis in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Citizen science is often used as an approach for participatory water quality monitoring; however, its application in aquaculture remains limited. This study evaluates the current state of citizen science in monitoring water quality, with a particular focus on its implications for aquaculture practices. A systematic literature review was conducted using the Scopus and Web of Science databases to explore (1) common approaches for setting up and running such projects, (2) frequently used data collection tools and techniques, and (3) key water quality parameters. An in-depth review of 51 publications shows that citizen science studies are geographically concentrated in North America and Europe, with fewer studies in other regions. Most citizen science projects follow contributory models with a top-down approach, where scientists design research and citizens contribute data. Among the monitored parameters, chemical indicators, such as pH, are the most commonly monitored due to their significance in aquatic ecosystems and the availability of affordable test kits. These kits are widely used due to their ease of use and accessibility. However, the adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) technology remains limited, despite its potential to improve real-time monitoring and data accuracy. IoT-based systems, such as sensor boxes, can enhance citizen science by enabling automated data collection and expanding monitoring capabilities. Strengthening the integration of real-time monitoring technologies and broadening the range of monitored parameters could enhance the role of citizen science in aquaculture, supporting more effective and sustainable water quality management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.