Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40817948›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2025

Nurse Staffing Management in the Context of Emergency Departments and Seasonal Respiratory Diseases: An Artificial Intelligence and Discrete-Event Simulation Approach.

Miguel Ortiz-Barrios, Llanos Cuenca, Sebastián Arias-Fonseca, Sally McClean, Armando Pérez-Aguilar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miguel Ortiz-BarriosCentro de Investigación en Gestión e Ingeniería de Producción (CIGIP), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, Valencia, Valencia, 46022, Spain. miorbar@upv.es.
Llanos CuencaCentro de Investigación en Gestión e Ingeniería de Producción (CIGIP), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, Valencia, Valencia, 46022, Spain.
Sebastián Arias-FonsecaDepartment of Productivity and Innovation, Universidad de la Costa CUC, Barranquilla, 080002, Colombia.
Sally McCleanSchool of Computing, Ulster University, Belfast, BT15 1ED, UK.
Armando Pérez-AguilarDivision of Computer Systems Engineering, TecNM: Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Villa la Venta, La Venta, Huimanguillo, Tabasco, México.

Funding

European Commission Next Generation EU - Margarita SalasMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Program for Requalification of the Spanish University System 2021-2023Universitat Politècnica de València Recovery, Transformation, and Resilience Plan
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency Departments (EDs) usually experience nursing shortages during Seasonal Respiratory Diseases (SRDs). As a result, patient waiting times for medical treatment increase with the consequent overcrowding, high intra-hospital infection rates, and no-shows. Therefore, the nurse staffing must be balanced with the projected volume of SRD-related ED admissions to EDs. In this article, we propose merging Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) to build remedies that diminish the waiting times for nursing care in mild and severe respiratory-affected patients. We first implemented Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to calculate the probability of treatment within the ED wards. Afterwards, we plugged the XGBoost predictions into a simulation model to evaluate whether the current nurse staff was sufficient to ensure the timely treatment of the expected respiratory-affected patients. Ultimately, we pretested three improvement scenarios recommended by the hospital administrators to tackle the imbalance problem. A Spanish ED was involved in the project to validate the suggested approach. The specificity of the predictive AI-based model was 95.97% (CI 95% 93.07% - 97.90%), while the specificity was 82.0% (CI 95% 73.05% - 88.96%). On a different tack, the positive and negative predictive scores corresponded to 87.23% (CI 95% 78.76% - 93.22%) and 94.08% (95% CI 90.80% - 96.45%). Furthermore, the Area Under Receiver Operator Characteristic (AU-ROC) curve was 89.00% (CI 95% 84.46% - 94.78%). Ultimately, the median waiting time for respiratory support use was lessened between 0.88 and 7.51 h after using a new nurse staffing configuration.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEmergency Service, HospitalNursing Staff, HospitalPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingRespiratory Tract DiseasesComputer SimulationHumansSeasonsSpainArtificial intelligence (AI)Discrete-event-simulation (DES)Emergency department (ED)Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)Nurse staffingSeasonal respiratory diseases (SRDs)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.