ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Nurse Staffing Management in the Context of Emergency Departments and Seasonal Respiratory Diseases: An Artificial Intelligence and Discrete-Event Simulation Approach.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Resilience of ICU Nurse Staffing Standard Operating Procedures Under Demand Variability: A Discrete Event Simulation Study Using MIMIC-IV.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Construction and Efficiency Estimation of a Nursing Human Resource Evaluation System in Integrated Medical-Nursing Elderly Care Institutions Using Data Envelopment Analysis.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- From Coordination to Personalization: A Trust-Aware Simulation Framework for AI-Driven Personalized Decision Support in Emergency Departments.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emergency Departments (EDs) usually experience nursing shortages during Seasonal Respiratory Diseases (SRDs). As a result, patient waiting times for medical treatment increase with the consequent overcrowding, high intra-hospital infection rates, and no-shows. Therefore, the nurse staffing must be balanced with the projected volume of SRD-related ED admissions to EDs. In this article, we propose merging Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) to build remedies that diminish the waiting times for nursing care in mild and severe respiratory-affected patients. We first implemented Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to calculate the probability of treatment within the ED wards. Afterwards, we plugged the XGBoost predictions into a simulation model to evaluate whether the current nurse staff was sufficient to ensure the timely treatment of the expected respiratory-affected patients. Ultimately, we pretested three improvement scenarios recommended by the hospital administrators to tackle the imbalance problem. A Spanish ED was involved in the project to validate the suggested approach. The specificity of the predictive AI-based model was 95.97% (CI 95% 93.07% - 97.90%), while the specificity was 82.0% (CI 95% 73.05% - 88.96%). On a different tack, the positive and negative predictive scores corresponded to 87.23% (CI 95% 78.76% - 93.22%) and 94.08% (95% CI 90.80% - 96.45%). Furthermore, the Area Under Receiver Operator Characteristic (AU-ROC) curve was 89.00% (CI 95% 84.46% - 94.78%). Ultimately, the median waiting time for respiratory support use was lessened between 0.88 and 7.51 h after using a new nurse staffing configuration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40817948What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.