ArticleUrolithiasis2025
From body mass index to waist circumference: a paradigm shift in assessing access complexity in percutaneous nephrolithotomy- comparative study.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) on renal access difficulty during percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery (PCNL) with fluoroscopic guided PCNL (FPCNL) and ultrasonographic guided PCNL (UPCNL) access techniques. 109 patients underwent PCNL, with 63 FGPNL and 46 UPCNL techniques. Patients were categorized as WC ≥ 90 or less cm and BMI ≥ 30 or less. Stone-free rate (SFR) was presented as Grade A (no stone), Grade B (≤ 2 mm), Grade C (A + B + 2.1-4 mm), and > 4 mm, based on a non-contrast computed tomography scan. The difficulty level of access was evaluated by number of accesses attempted (NAA) and access time (AT). SFR was similar between patients with low and high WC and BMI (40% for BMI < 30 vs. 42% for BMI > 30, p = 0.389 and 43.7% for WC < 90 vs. 30.7% for WC > 90, p = 0.779). SFR is also similar between UPCNL (41.3%) and FPCNL (44.4%) techniques, p = 0.733. In the UPCNL technique, increased WC, not BMI, is associated with increased NAA and AT. In the FPCNL technique, however, BMI and WC did not affect access parameters. A linear regression analysis indicated that only WC and hydronephroses levels had reached a prediction power for an AT and NAA (p < 0.05). In patients with central obesity, WC may be a more reliable predictor than BMI for estimating access difficulty in the UPCNL technique. While UPCNL appears to have a safety advantage over FPCNL regarding radiation exposure, FPCNL may be a more suitable option for obese patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40817931What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.