ArticleAnnals of emergency medicine2026
Prevalence of Adverse Drug Reactions: Comparing Crotalidae Immune Polyvalent Antivenoms F(ab')
Article in Annals of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The alpha-gal syndrome: Understanding the role of tick bites, and the delays in severe anaphylaxis.Allergy and asthma proceedings · 2026Review
- Review
- Antivenom Choice in the Management of Snake Envenomation.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesNorth American pit viper antivenoms, CroFab® and ANAVIP®, contain galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-GAL) oligosaccharide. We compared adverse drug reactions, including presumed anaphylaxis, following administration of these antivenoms and investigated biological plausibility of these antivenoms leading to anaphylaxis in α-GAL-immunoglobulin (Ig) E-sensitized individuals.
methodsWe performed 2 studies. A retrospective chart review from the Arkansas Poison Center (May 2021 to July 2023) identified adverse drug reactions and presumed anaphylaxis in patients treated with crotaline antivenom. Two allergists (JK, LM), blinded to the antivenom used, adjudicated presumed anaphylaxis cases. To assess whether antivenoms could activate basophils from α-GAL-IgE-sensitized individuals, basophil activation tests were performed on blood from 5 α-GAL-IgE-sensitized participants with a history of mammalian meat allergy. Basophil activation was assessed by %CD63 upregulation.
resultsAdverse drug reactions without presumed anaphylaxis occurred in 7 out of 171 (4.1%) Fab recipients versus 8 out of 37 (21.6%) F(ab')
conclusionWe demonstrate a substantial incidence of adverse drug reactions and presumed anaphylaxis to crotaline antivenoms in an α-GAL endemic region, with F(ab')
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.