ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
The Cox Model With Adaptive Fused Group Bridge Penalty to Incorporate Historical Data Into the Analysis of Clinical Trials With an Application to BMT CTN 1101.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The incorporation of historical data (HD) into a clinical trial analysis can improve the precision and efficiency of treatment evaluation if the HD are exchangeable with clinical trial data. Evaluating the exchangeability of these two data sets is challenging, however, as an incorrect assessment of exchangeability yields invalid inference on the treatment effect that may produce bias and inflate the Type I error rate. To address this practical problem, we propose an adaptive fused group bridge penalty to evaluate the comparability of parameters between HD and clinical trial data and make inferences on the treatment effect. The proposed penalty has oracle properties, including consistency for identifying the underlying model and the asymptotic normality of the estimators. Simulation studies show that the proposed method controls the Type I error rate better and has higher power than competing methods under both exchangeable and non-exchangeable settings. We apply the proposed method by reanalyzing a Phase III trial while also leveraging a corresponding HD set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.